Kenneth G. and Kim M. Bohnet - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         

          income.  Petitioners did not file a Federal income tax return for           
          1995.                                                                       
                                       OPINION                                        
               Section 61 defines gross income as all income from whatever            
          source derived.  Gross income includes compensation for services            
          and interest.  See sec. 61(a)(1), (4).  In general, the                     
          Commissioner's determinations in a notice of deficiency are                 
          presumed correct, and taxpayers bear the burden of proving them             
          erroneous.  See Rule 142(a).                                                
               Petitioners do not challenge the facts on which respondent's           
          determinations are based or respondent's calculation of tax.                
          Petitioners stipulated that during 1995 they received wages and             
          interest.  At trial and on brief, petitioners advanced shopworn             
          arguments characteristic of tax-protester rhetoric that has been            
          universally rejected by this and other courts.  See Wilcox v.               
          Commissioner, 848 F.2d 1007 (9th Cir. 1988), affg. T.C. Memo.               
          1987-225; Carter v. Commissioner, 784 F.2d 1006, 1009 (9th Cir.             
          1986).  Petitioners allege:  (1) The wages they received are not            
          income subject to tax under section 61; (2) the Individual Master           
          File states that no notice of deficiency was ever sent; (3) the             
          Internal Revenue Service did not send a notice of deficiency and            
          did not file a return as mandated by section 6020(b); (4)                   
          petitioners did not receive any wages, were not employees as                
          defined, and therefore had no filing requirement; and (5) taxing            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011