Robert W. and Janet L. Carlson - Page 11




                                       - 11 -                                         

               Thus, if debt proceeds are allocated by the passthrough                
          entity to a trade or business expense, the interest on the debt             
          is similarly allocated.  In the case before us, however, no                 
          proceeds of debt incurred by Aqua Sun have been allocated by Aqua           
          Sun to its trade or business, so allocation rules are not germane           
          to petitioners' position here.                                              
               As a final argument, petitioners seek to have us declare               
          invalid section 1.163-9T(b)(2)(i)(B), Temporary Income Tax Regs.,           
          52 Fed. Reg. 48409 (Dec. 22, 1987).                                         
               This provision reads as follows:                                       
                    (2)  Interest relating to taxes--(i)  In general.                 
               Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2)(iii) of this section,           
               personal interest includes interest--                                  
                         *    *    *    *    *    *    *                              
                         (B)  Paid under section 453C(e)(4)(B) [now section           
                    453(l)(3)] (interest on deferred tax resulting from               
                    certain installment sales) and section 1291(c)                    
                    (interest on deferred tax attributable to passive                 
                    foreign investment companies); or * * *                           
          Petitioners' challenge to the validity of this regulation is                
          mooted by our holding that the interest paid by petitioner                  
          pursuant to section 453(l)(3) is not paid or incurred in a trade            
          or business of petitioner, so that, regardless of the validity or           
          invalidity of the regulation, we need not consider the merits of            
          petitioners' argument.                                                      








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011