Carlye A. Christianson - Page 7




                                        - 7 -                                         
               Petitioner made some estimated tax payments for her taxable            
          year 1987.  Mr. Golemb filed on petitioner's behalf requests for            
          extensions of time to file the returns for certain of the years             
          at issue.                                                                   
               At some time during the years at issue, petitioner discussed           
          with Mr. Golemb the fact that she had not received a tax bill               
          from the Service.  During that discussion, petitioner and Mr.               
          Golemb speculated that petitioner had not received a tax bill               
          because respondent might have lost track of her records when her            
          surname changed after her divorce from Mr. Reynolds.  At no point           
          did petitioner believe that she had a responsibility to contact             
          the Service because she had not received a tax bill for any of              
          the years at issue.                                                         
               In March 1992, the Service sent petitioner a letter re-                
          questing that she telephone a revenue agent of the Service                  
          (revenue agent) who was responsible for the examination of                  
          petitioner in order to discuss her status as a nonfiler.  Pe-               
          titioner never contacted the revenue agent.  Consequently, in               
          April 1992, the revenue agent telephoned petitioner after having            
          obtained her telephone number through the Yellow Pages.  During             
          that telephone conversation, the revenue agent told petitioner              
          that the Service had no records of her having filed returns since           
          1981 and requested that petitioner clarify her filing status.  In           
          response, petitioner adamantly maintained that she had filed all            
          her returns.  Subsequently, during the same telephone conversa-             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011