Compaq Computer Corporation and Subsidiaries - Page 15




                                       - 15 -                                         
               reduced.  Where ACT is used to offset mainstream tax,                  
               the offset will be viewed as a refund of the ACT                       
               initially allowed as a credit and as a tax paid in                     
               respect of the year for which the ACT is applied as an                 
               offset.  Consequently, a reduction in the foreign tax                  
               credit for the year from which the ACT is carried must                 
               be made in accordance with section 905(c) of the Code.                 
               [Technical Explanation, 1980-1 C.B. at 473.]                           
          The Technical Explanation's view of the ACT, as a tax, originally           
          imposed but then refunded, upon the use of the corporate offset,            
          is the basis of Rev. Proc. 80-18, 1980-1 C.B. at 625, which, in             
          turn, states in relevant part:                                              
                    Paragraph 1(c) of Article 23 provides, in                         
               addition, that the one-half of the ACT paid by a United                
               Kingdom corporation that is not refunded to a U.S.                     
               direct investor and that would be credited or refunded                 
               to a United Kingdom individual resident is treated as                  
               an income tax imposed on the distributing United                       
               Kingdom corporation (rather than the U.S. shareholder).                
               Under United Kingdom law, a United Kingdom corporation                 
               that pays ACT may, however, transfer to a related                      
               United Kingdom corporation the right to apply ACT                      
               against mainstream tax liability.  Thus, for example, a                
               United Kingdom subsidiary of a United Kingdom                          
               corporation may benefit from the parent's ACT payment                  
               by offsetting part or all of the ACT against its own                   
               liability for United Kingdom mainstream tax.  In such a                
               case, for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes and pursuant                
               to Article 23, the parent corporation has not paid or                  
               accrued the unrefunded ACT offset against the                          
               subsidiary's mainstream tax and has contributed to the                 
               capital of the subsidiary an amount equal to the                       
               unrefunded ACT offset.  The subsidiary is considered to                
               have paid or accrued only mainstream tax paid or                       
               accrued in excess of the ACT offset, plus the amount of                
               unrefunded ACT so offset.                                              
          According to respondent, the allocation of the corporate offset             
          to a subsidiary must be viewed as a capital contribution of the             
          unrefunded ACT from the parent to the subsidiary and, at such               






Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011