-3- 2. Discharge of Indebtedness Income Dove Canyon made a profit from its activities in its first years. Later, a downturn in the California real estate market, inflation, and increased interest costs resulted in significant losses on the project. In 1992 and 1993, banks forgave a substantial amount of debt owed by Dove Canyon. Thus, Dove Canyon realized $20,345,080 in discharge of indebtedness income in 1992 and $11,887,728 in 1993. Cost overruns and a decline in real estate values caused Dove Canyon's debts to exceed the value of its assets. The income from discharge of indebtedness was included in Dove Canyon's taxable income since, in the case of partnerships, the insolvency exception applies at the partner level. See sec. 108(a)(1)(B), (d)(6). Mikama's allocable share of discharge of indebtedness income from Dove Canyon was $2,034,508 for 1992 and $1,188,773 for 1993. In 1992, Mikama excluded $2,034,508 from gross income under section 108(a)(1)(B). In 1993, Mikama excluded $952,600 from gross income because section 108(a)(3) limits the section 108(a)(1)(B) exclusion to the amount by which the taxpayer is insolvent. Mikama's assets in 1992 and 1993 were its partnership interest in Dove Canyon and a small amount of cash. Mikama had cash before the discharge of indebtedness of $1,900 in 1992 and $1,100 in 1993.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011