- 8 - There is no credible evidence that petitioner consulted with experts in the music industry in an effort to further his music career. Sec. 1.183-2(b)(2), Income Tax Regs. We also note that petitioner expected his musical instruments to depreciate in value. Sec. 1.183-2(b)(2), (4), Income Tax Regs. Notwithstanding petitioner's contention that he expended a fair amount of time and effort in his music activity, we note that petitioner was employed full time as an engineer, operated a sales business in 1994, rendered personal care to Saundra who was fatally ill in 1994, and raised his children during the years in issue. We are not convinced that petitioner devoted as much time to his music activity as he claimed he did. The record also does not establish that petitioner was successful in his music activity. For 1994 and 1995, petitioner reported losses in the amounts of $3,686 and $6,925, respectively. Although petitioner reported gross income in the amount of $600 in 1994, petitioner reported related expenses in the amount of $4,286. During 1994 and 1995, the Forms 1040 reported wages in the amounts of $52,169 and $78,401, respectively. This helps to persuade us that petitioner's music activity was only a hobby. Sec. 1.183-2((b)(8), Income Tax Regs. We do not doubt petitioner's desire to "make it big enough in the music business to make that a full-time profession." However, viewing the record as a whole, we are satisfied thatPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011