- 128 - him to do something for me on the 1978 situation, and there wasn't anything happening. The procedure went through a tax firm in Los Angeles known as Loeb & Loeb, and I wound up with the DeCastro Law Corporation by way of their direction, and made several discoveries that were startling to me. And of course, I settled. To be quite honest, I had to get out of this. I was not going to spend my life-- Mr. McWade: Well, let me-- Mr. Thompson: --doing all this. Mr. McWade: Let me stop you here for a moment. Mr. Thompson: Okay. I'm sorry. I beg your pardon. Mr. McWade: Mr. Thompson, can you tell me: have we been successful in getting the lien removed from your house? The subject of the Thompson settlement did not arise again during Mr. Thompson's testimony at the trial of the test cases.55 Mr. McWade followed the colloquy quoted above by asking Mr. Thompson whether he had ever tendered stock certificates to Mr. Kersting. Mr. Thompson responded that, contrary to Mr. Kersting's promises, he tried twice (through Mr. DeCastro and Mr. Chanin) to tender his stock certificates to Mr. Kersting in exchange for the cancellation of his promissory notes but had been refused. 55 In Dixon II, Judge Goffe interpreted Mr. Thompson's remarks concerning settlement as pertaining to the resolution of Mr. Thompson's tax liability for 1978--a year for which the Thompsons had not been issued a notice of deficiency. See Dixon II, 62 T.C.M. (CCH) at 1472-1473, 1991 T.C.M. (RIA), at 91-3014 to 91-3015. In retrospect, and in the light of what has come out, it is more likely that Mr. Thompson in his above-quoted testimony was referring to the settlement on his behalf that Mr. DeCastro had negotiated with Mr. McWade.Page: Previous 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011