- 189 -
D. Denial of Mr. Izen's Motion To Refer Thompson and Cravens
Settlements and Alexander Agreement to Department of Justice
(Public Integrity Section)
On June 26, 1996, Mr. Izen filed a Motion to Refer the
Thompson and Cravens Settlements and the Alexander Agreement to
the Department of Justice (Public Integrity Section) for
prosecution. Mr. Izen identified approximately 17 alleged crimes
associated with the Thompson and Cravens settlements and the
Alexander understanding and asked the Court to refer those
matters to the Department of Justice for prosecution. By order
dated June 26, 1996, the Court denied Mr. Izen's motion.
III. Developments Following Initial Evidentiary Hearing
A. Denial of Respondent's Motion for Further Hearing Regarding
Potential Witness Intimidation
On October 28, 1996, after completion of the bulk of the
evidentiary hearing, respondent filed a motion to take additional
evidence concerning Mr. Sticht's unresolved allegations at the
evidentiary hearing of potential witness intimidation. During
this same period, the parties filed with the Court third, fourth,
and fifth supplemental stipulations of facts that did not comply
with the Court's Rules concerning stipulations and amounted to
little more than a proffer of documents subject to an extensive
list of objections.
83(...continued)
Thompson v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 486 (1989). None of these
questions have been resolved; they became moot with respect to
Mr. Kersting and Mr. Bradt by reason of Mr. Kersting's failure to
testify at the evidentiary hearing.
Page: Previous 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011