Jerry and Patricia A. Dixon, et al - Page 121




                                       - 200 -                                        

          in greater detail infra pp. 302-305, we will lift the protective            
          orders.                                                                     
                              ULTIMATE FINDINGS OF FACT                               
               Messrs. Sims and McWade negotiated a series of contingent              
          settlement agreements with Mr. DeCastro in respect of the                   
          Thompsons' tax liabilities in advance of the trial of the test              
          cases.  The final Thompson settlement agreement provided for a              
          reduction in the Thompsons' tax liabilities for 1979, 1980, and             
          1981 for the purpose of generating refunds of tax and interest              
          that were used to pay Mr. DeCastro's attorney's fees.  The                  
          refunds actually made were more than sufficient for this purpose;           
          the excess was received and retained by the Thompsons.  The                 
          Thompson settlement was not based upon or influenced by the                 
          Thompsons' participation in the Bauspar program.                            
               Messrs. Sims and McWade negotiated a contingent settlement             
          agreement with Mr. Cravens in respect of the Cravenses' tax                 
          liabilities for 1979 and 1980 in advance of the trial of the test           
          cases.  Messrs. Sims and McWade misled Mr. Cravens as to the                
          nature and legal effect of his settlement and the need for                  
          counsel at the trial of the test cases.  In so doing, they                  
          foreclosed the possibility that the Cravenses would become                  
          clients of Chicoine and Hallett, and later, of Mr. Izen.  They              
          thereby reduced the effectiveness of Mr. Cravens' presentations             
          to the Court from the point of view of all petitioners; the                 
          likelihood that Mr. Cravens would have informed counsel for test            



Page:  Previous  190  191  192  193  194  195  196  197  198  199  200  201  202  203  204  205  206  207  208  209  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011