Richard L. and Kathryn Dyckman - Page 4




                                        - 4 -                                         

          enthusiastic about what she thought would be an environmentally             
          conscious investment.                                                       
               Petitioners issued a $5,000 check in Mr. Kipness' name                 
          leaving him to take care of any remaining details.  Mr. Kipness             
          invested petitioners' $5,000 in a partnership known as D L & K              
          Associates, making Mr. Dyckman a limited partner in that                    
          partnership.  Petitioners were not provided with any literature,            
          such as an offering letter or prospectus, regarding their                   
          investment.                                                                 
               Because they were unsophisticated in financial matters,                
          petitioners did not inquire much about their investment.  Mr.               
          Kipness simply told petitioners that they were investing in some            
          sort of "waste management" or "recycling" venture, that any                 
          possible loss would be limited to their investment, and that                
          their short-term profit potential would be limited, but that in             
          the long run their investment could be highly profitable.                   
               Petitioners expected to receive literature regarding their             
          investment at some future time.  When such information was not              
          forthcoming, petitioners contacted Mr. Kipness a few months later           
          and inquired regarding their investment and its status.                     
          Subsequently, petitioners were informed that petitioners'                   
          investment had been a "bust".  Petitioners were devastated to               
          lose their investment, and they did not thereafter make any                 
          similar investments.                                                        
               Unbeknownst to petitioners, their investment was in a                  
          partnership formed chiefly to produce tax benefits.  D L & K                

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011