Exxon Corporation - Page 20




                                       - 20 -                                         
          increased operating costs were becoming a disincentive to North             
          Sea oil and gas development activity.                                       
               As a result of the above increases and decreases in world              
          oil prices and the changing perceptions regarding PRT and the PRT           
          rate, in 1979, 1980, 1982, and 1993 the tax rate for PRT was                
          changed from the original rate of 45 percent as enacted in 1975             
          to the rates indicated:                                                     

                              1979      1980      1982      1993                      
               PRT Rate       60%       70%       75%       50%                       

               In 1993, PRT was eliminated for all subsequent North Sea oil           
          and gas activity under licenses to be issued thereafter, and, as            
          indicated, the PRT rate was reduced to 50 percent for existing              
          licenses.                                                                   
               For 1975 through 1988, Exxon paid �3.5 billion in PRT,                 
          approximately 11 percent of the approximate total �32 billion in            
          PRT that was paid to the United Kingdom by all oil and gas                  
          companies for those years.                                                  
               Because primarily of timing differences associated with                
          calculations of PRT at the field level and because PRT was                  
          deductible in computing the Ring Fence Tax, for any 1 year                  
          companies may owe PRT but no Ring Fence Tax, they may owe Ring              
          Fence Tax but no PRT, and they may owe both PRT and Ring Fence              
          Tax or neither.  These differing results are not inconsistent               
          with the objective of PRT to tax extraordinary profits and to               





Page:  Previous  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011