Exxon Corporation and Affiliated Companies - Page 5




                                        - 5 -                                         

          possible.  No agreement, however, was entered into or reached               
          between Exxon’s and respondent’s representatives as to                      
          specifically when and how Exxon’s representatives would                     
          communicate to respondent’s representatives Exxon’s agreement               
          with and decision not to protest discrete audit adjustments.                
               During respondent’s audits, respondent's representatives               
          examined Exxon’s books and records and, generally through                   
          information document requests (IDR's), requested information and            
          documents from Exxon.                                                       
               As adjustments were identified with regard to Exxon’s                  
          Federal income tax liabilities, respondent's representatives                
          would prepare and provide to Exxon’s representatives written                
          Notices of Proposed Adjustment (Forms 5701) describing the                  
          amounts and nature of the adjustments.                                      
          Also during the audits, Exxon’s representatives would                       
          provide to respondent’s representatives information regarding               
          income, expense, and credit items that Exxon's representatives              
          had identified as not being reflected accurately on Exxon’s                 
          consolidated corporation income tax returns.  Items so provided             
          by Exxon’s representatives to respondent's representatives are              
          referred to by Exxon and herein as “volunteered” adjustments.               
          Some of the volunteered adjustments represented adjustments in              
          favor of Exxon and some in favor of respondent.                             







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011