- 11 - Fairbanks' intellectual property will appreciate in value. Petitioner conceded that he has never built a working prototype of the pool heating unit. Petitioner's forecast of million-dollar profits is therefore based upon mere speculation. Petitioner has also failed to produce any projected revenue stream studies or to substantiate the cost of producing even one remote-controlled pool heating unit. Petitioner's financial status also indicates a lack of profit motive in his consulting activity. From the record, it is clear that the only year Fairbanks showed a net profit was 1992, the first year Fairbanks provided consulting services. Petitioner reported the following gross receipts and net losses from Fairbanks on Schedule C for the 1992-97 tax years: 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Gross receipts $17,431$5,400 - - - - Profit/loss5,630 (7,015) ($14,161) ($16,389) ($12,532) ($19,296) Petitioner also reported the following wage and capital gains income for the 1992-97 tax years: 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Wages and $13,816 $37,453 $69,464 $80,046 $49,617 $51,401 capital gains The record clearly reflects that petitioner used large net losses from Fairbanks to offset wage and capital gains income. In the context of section 183 "profit" means an economic profit, independent of tax savings. See Surloff v. Commissioner, 81 T.C. 210, 233 (1983).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011