- 3 - capital gain, petitioner had not provided evidence of basis to respondent before the issuance of the notice of deficiency, and thus respondent’s determinations accounted for gross proceeds from sales of capital assets. Before the record in this case was closed, petitioner presented evidence from which the parties were able to stipulate petitioner’s cost basis in, and, where relevant, costs of sale of, almost all of the capital assets. The parties likewise stipulated that petitioner received capital gains in various amounts during the years in issue. We find that petitioner had income (and loss) in the following amounts during the years in issue, based on the fact that petitioner has stipulated, admitted, or failed to dispute respondent’s evidence with respect to those amounts:Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011