Karen and Gary Fujita - Page 2




                                        - 2 -                                          

          $300.54, respectively, and an accuracy-related penalty under                 
          section 6662(a) in the amount of $2,192.80.  By separate notice              
          of deficiency, respondent determined an $8,817.80 deficiency in              
          Gary Fujita's (petitioner) 1995 Federal income tax and additions             
          to tax under sections 6651(a) and 6654(a) in the amounts of                  
          $1,713.70 and $359.86, respectively.  By separate notice of                  
          deficiency, respondent determined a $2,404 deficiency in Karen               
          Fujita's (Mrs. Fujita) 1995 Federal income tax and an addition to            
          tax under section 6651(a) in the amount of $403.25.                          
               The issues for decision are:2  (1) Whether for 1994 and 1995            
          petitioners are properly subject to Federal income tax.  We hold             
          they are.  (2) Whether for 1994 and 1995 petitioners are liable              
          for additions to tax under section 6651(a).  We hold they are.               
          (3) Whether for 1994 petitioners are liable for an addition to               
          tax under section 6654(a).  We lack jurisdiction to decide this              
          issue.  (4) Whether for 1994 petitioners are liable for an                   
          accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a).  We hold they                


               1(...continued)                                                         
          are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, unless                 
          otherwise indicated.                                                         
               2The parties stipulated that "The sole issue to be decided              
          by the Tax Court in this case is whether wages paid to a private             
          individual by a private employer constitute property subject to              
          federal income taxation."  We shall not be bound by this                     
          stipulation, however, as it does not take into consideration the             
          additions to tax and accuracy-related penalty or that petitioners            
          had income from sources other than wages.                                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011