Howard G. and Anna C. Grider - Page 7




                                        - 7 -                                          
          B.   Accuracy-Related Penalty Under Section 6662                             
               Respondent determined and contends that petitioners are                 
          liable for the accuracy-related penalty for negligence under                 
          section 6662(a) and (c) for 1994.                                            
               Section 6662(a) and (b)(1) imposes a 20-percent penalty on              
          the portion of an underpayment attributable to negligence.                   
          Negligence includes a failure to make a reasonable attempt to                
          comply with the Internal Revenue Code or to exercise ordinary and            
          reasonable care in that respect.  See sec. 6662(c).  Petitioners             
          bear the burden of proving that they are not liable for the                  
          accuracy-related penalty imposed by section 6662(a).  See Rule               
          142(a).                                                                      
               Petitioners contend that their underpayment was not due to              
          negligence or intentional and willful disregard of rules or                  
          regulations because they have consistently used the same method              
          of accounting for more than 40 years.  They also contend that                
          respondent conceded this addition to tax.  Petitioners provided a            
          copy of an unsigned decision document that appears to have been              
          prepared by respondent which states that petitioners are not                 
          liable under section 6662(a) for 1994.  We do not consider that              
          document because it is not in evidence.                                      
               We believe that petitioners were negligent.  Petitioners                
          improperly mixed cash and accrual methods of accounting.  They               
          understated gross receipts on their Schedule C by $139,993 and               






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011