T.C. Memo. 1999-425 UNITED STATES TAX COURT THOMAS F. AND THERESE GROJEAN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 14374-98. Filed December 29, 1999. P organized A to acquire 100 percent of the stock of S. To finance the purchase, A and S borrowed $13.2 million from the bank, and A and S signed a promissory note in favor of the bank (the note). P was not a party to the note. P contemporaneously borrowed $1.2 million from the bank and signed a note in favor of the bank (P note), and P used the funds to purchase a $1.2- million participation interest in the note. The note and the P note had identical terms, and the bank automatically credited amounts due under the P note with amounts due P for his participation interest. No cash changed hands, and all funds were electronically credited at the bank. In calculating his allowable distributive share of S losses for 1989, 1990, and 1991, P included in his basis $1.2 million for his participation share. Held: In substance P functioned as a guarantor of $1.2 million of the note, and P is not entitled to include in his S basis the $1.2 million participation interest. P did not make the requisitePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011