- 14 - for that year because respondent determined that those expenses were not incurred in a trade or business. However, respondent allowed petitioners to include those expenses as Schedule A deductions subject to the 2-percent adjusted gross income limita- tion for miscellaneous deductions under section 67(a) and the 3- percent adjusted gross income limitation under section 68(a).5 In the notice for 1993 and 1994, respondent disallowed all the expenses that petitioners claimed in Schedules C of their returns for those years because petitioners did not establish that those expenses were ordinary and necessary expenses incurred in the ordinary course of business. In that notice, respondent did not allow petitioners to include any of those disallowed expenses as Schedule A deductions. Petitioners contend that respondent improperly disallowed the Schedule C expenses that they claimed for the years at issue. Petitioners also assert that they are entitled for 1992 to additional expenses of $323.97 and $200 for legal fees and engineering fees, respectively, that they did not claim in Schedule C of their return for that year. Respondent disagrees. Deductions are strictly a matter of legislative grace, and petitioners bear the burden of proving that they are entitled to the deductions claimed. INDOPCO, Inc. v. Commissioner, 503 U.S. 79, 84 (1992). Section 162(a) allows a deduction for ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year 5 See supra note 3 for respondent's concession regarding the real estate taxes of $2,775.04 that petitioners claimed in Schedule C of their 1992 return.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011