Estate of Ona E. Hendrickson - Page 47





                                        - 47 -                                         

          Harwood v. Commissioner, 82 T.C. 239, 259 (1984), affd. without              
          published opinion 786 F.2d 1174 (9th Cir. 1986).  There is no                
          evidence of any arm's-length bargaining of decedent with her                 
          children that suggests that business purposes rather than family             
          relationships were the impelling considerations.  Also, as noted             
          above, decedent's alleged contributions to the partnership                   
          substantially exceeded her share of the partnership's losses; the            
          value of the services allegedly performed by the children was                
          relatively small compared to the value of decedent's capital                 
          contributions; and the children allegedly received equal shares              
          in the partnership, although they provided substantially unequal             
          services.11                                                                  
               For all these reasons, we find that decedent did not make               
          any transfers to the asserted family farm partnership that were              
          bona fide, at arm's length, and free from donative intent.                   


               11 We again note that in 1984 or 1985, Donald Hendrickson               
          began farming the family farm land formerly rented to certain                
          tenant farmers, and that by 1992, Donald Hendrickson was farming             
          substantially all the family farm land.  Donald Hendrickson                  
          testified that the other children and he were conducting this                
          farming as tenants; he also testified that whatever profit he                
          made from farming the family farm land he divided 50 percent to              
          decedent and 50 percent to the children.                                     
               As set forth supra p. 20, the annual gross income Garry’s               
          estate received from the entire family farm during 1986-93, when             
          substantial acreage was being farmed by Donald Hendrickson, was              
          far less than the farm rental income the estate received during              
          1979-85, when only a part of the farm was being rented to tenant             
          farmers.  This further suggests that if the alleged family farm              
          partnership existed, it was not an arm’s-length arrangement.                 




Page:  Previous  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011