Fred Henry - Page 12




                                        - 12 -                                         

                    I * * * understand and agree that the full amount                  
               of this payment will be applied to the amount of a                      
               negotiated settlement, if any, or to any final judge-                   
               ment that may be entered with respect to my * * *                       
               claims.                                                                 
               I * * * UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THIS IS NEITHER A                     
               RELEASE ON MY * * * CLAIM NOR AN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF                     
               LIABILITY BY E. I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY, INC.                    
               Neither the $50,000 assistance payment that Mr. Henry                   
          received from du Pont in 1991 nor the $150,000 assistance payment            
          that he received from du Pont in 1992 was evidenced by a prom-               
          issory note.  Neither of those assistance payments was contingent            
          upon the pledging of security, and neither of them had any terms             
          of repayment.  No interest accrued on the respective assistance              
          payments that du Pont paid Mr. Henry in 1991 and 1992.                       
               When Mr. Henry received the respective assistance payments              
          from du Pont in 1991 and 1992, he was unemployed and was re-                 
          ceiving no income.  Mr. Henry was never informed that he was re-             
          quired to repay those assistance payments.                                   
               At an undisclosed time prior to March 19, 1992, Mr. Henry               
          submitted to Crawford a claim against du Pont as a result of his             
          use of Benlate in the total amount of $2,721,700, which consisted            
          of lost past and future sales, lost inventory, liability to                  
          customers pursuant to Florida law, and miscellaneous costs.  By              
          letter to Mr. Henry dated March 19, 1992, Crawford proposed on               
          behalf of du Pont a settlement with respect to that claim in the             







Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011