- 437 - Rappaport and provided no financing to the venture. Kanter would not share economically in the exploitation of the painting. OPINION Section 162 allows a deduction for all ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred in carrying on a trade or business. Expenses paid for or on behalf of another are not deductible. A voluntary assumption of liability is nondeductible. Polak's Frutal Works, Inc. v. United States, 176 F. Supp. 521 (S.D.N.Y. 1959), affd. 281 F.2d 261 (2d Cir. 1960). Obligations which do not grow out of a taxpayer's own business but which are personal in nature are nondeductible. Family Group, Inc. v. Commissioner, 59 T.C. 660 (1973). Although Kanter acknowledged that during 1980 he was practicing law on a full-time basis and was not in the business of buying and selling art, he contends that he was engaged in the business of assisting other individuals to locate financing for investments. He asserts that he "was in the trade or business of locating financing for investments, whether the investments be in real estate, securities, or works of art". Thus Kanter argued that the $104,231 was an ordinary and necessary expense of his investment financing business and was properly deductible by him. Alternatively, he contended that, even if the activity was not a trade or business, a deduction should be allowed under section 212.Page: Previous 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011