- 575 - respondent on brief stands by the concession for that year. However, respondent filed Amendments to Answers in IRA's cases for 1979, 1981 and 1982. In such Amendments to the Answers, respondent claimed that the "commission expenses" paid to J.D. Weaver in 1979, 1981, and 1982 in the amounts of $51,643, $38,601, and $74,015, respectively, should be disallowed. Contrary to IRA's contention, respondent's concession for 1983 does not mean a concession by respondent that the payments to Weaver by IRA's subsidiary KWJ were "commissions" for work or services Weaver performed for either IRA or KWJ in 1979, 1981 and 1982. It is clear that in the Hyatt transactions, Weaver influenced Lisle in connection with the awarding of the Embarcadero management contract to Hyatt. For his influence, A.N. Pritzker gave Weaver a 10-percent interest in the profits that Hyatt earned on the hotel. These payments were made by Hyatt to KWJ. After Hyatt went private, Weaver sold his stock in KWJ Corporation to IRA. In the sale, Weaver retained the right to receive 30 percent of the commissions thereafter paid by Hyatt. As these commissions were later paid by Hyatt to KWJ, the 30-percent portion was remitted to Weaver by IRA pursuant to the sales agreement. These amounts were claimed as business expense deductions on the consolidated income tax returns of IRA (which included KWJ's operations) for the years in question. The Court is satisfied from the record that after the sale of the KWJ stockPage: Previous 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011