- 3 - that petitioners were not entitled to an award of administrative and litigation costs and attorney's fees. We so held because petitioners failed to prove that they met the net worth requirements of section 7430 and therefore failed to establish that they were the "prevailing party". See Johnson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1999-127. On May 14, 1999, petitioners filed their motion for reconsideration and motion to vacate. On June 2, 1999, respondent filed an objection to petitioners' motion for reconsideration and an objection to petitioners' motion to vacate (respondent's objections). On June 7, 1999, petitioners filed a motion for permission to file a reply to respondent's objection to the motion for reconsideration (motion to file reply #2) and a motion for permission to file a reply to respondent's objection to the motion to vacate (motion to file reply #3). On June 21, 1999, the Court granted petitioners' motion to file reply #2 and motion to file reply #3 and filed petitioners' replies to respondent's objections. In petitioners' motion for reconsideration, motion to vacate,2 and replies to respondent's objections, petitioners argue that in Johnson II the Court misread the case law and that 2 Petitioners' motion for reconsideration and motion to vacate are virtually identical. The only difference is that one asks for reconsideration and the other asks for the decision to be vacated.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011