- 4 - petitioners' claimed 1993 unreimbursed employee expense deductions because petitioner was employed away from home for more than 1 year. Section 162 Travel Expense Deductions Deductions are a matter of legislative grace. See New Colonial Ice Co. v. Helvering, 292 U.S. 435, 440 (1934). Taxpayers bear the burden of proving that they are entitled to their claimed deductions. See Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933). Section 162(a)(2) allows a taxpayer to deduct traveling expenses incurred while away from home. A taxpayer may deduct traveling expenses under section 162(a)(2) if he satisfies the following three conditions: (1) The expense must be reasonable and necessary; (2) it must be incurred while away from home; and (3) it must be incurred in the pursuit of a trade or business. See Commissioner v. Flowers, 326 U.S. 465, 470 (1946). Respondent does not dispute that petitioners' expenses satisfy the first and third requirements. Respondent contends that petitioner was not away from home while working in Texas. For purposes of section 162(a)(2), generally a taxpayer's home is the vicinity of his principal place of employment, not where his personal residence is located. See Mitchell v. Commissioner, 74 T.C. 578, 581 (1980). However, if a taxpayer's principal place of employment is temporary rather thanPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011