- 5 -
also asked petitioner to identify and explain the particular
items which he disputed or which were of concern to him.
Petitioner did not reply. On June 4, 1998, respondent called
petitioner and was told that he had not received the letter.
Respondent sent petitioner a second copy of the letter. On June
30, 1998, respondent received a reply. The reply consisted of a
copy of part of respondent's letter with discursive notes written
on it and certain words and letters crossed out.
On August 6, 1998, respondent's counsel spoke with
petitioner to ascertain what action, if any, petitioner had
taken, or intended to take, to make available the documents he
would rely upon in the case. Petitioner said that due to his
medical condition and upon order of his doctors, he was unable to
travel to Connecticut, but that he intended to have his wife and
friends return to Connecticut in September in order to retrieve
the documents. Petitioner stated he was not willing to incur an
expense of approximately $500 to have the boxed documents mailed
to him in Washington.
On August 11, 1998, respondent wrote petitioner requesting
that he provide a letter from his doctor confirming his inability
to travel as well as stating, if possible, an opinion as to when
petitioner might be able to travel. Petitioner has provided no
letter. Respondent's August 11, 1998, letter also set forth all
the issues and items in dispute in this case. Respondent
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011