Willliam N. and Beth Ann Katsaros - Page 2




                                        - 2 -                                         

          tax under section 6654 in the amount of $217 and an accuracy-               
          related penalty under section 6662(b)(1) in the amount of $130.             
               After concessions by both parties,2 the issues for decision            
          are:  (1) Whether certain corporate distributions to William                
          Katsaros constitute loans, or compensation for services; and (2)            
          whether petitioners are liable for an accuracy-related penalty              
          under section 6662.                                                         
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          The stipulation of facts and the attached exhibits are                      
          incorporated herein by reference.  At the time the petition was             
          filed, petitioners resided in Santa Rosa, California.                       
          Petitioners are husband and wife.  References to petitioner are             
          to William Katsaros.                                                        
                                     Background                                       
               In 1991, petitioner and his father acquired an escrow                  
          company in Hawaii called Hawaii Island Escrow, Inc. (HIEI).                 
          Petitioner's father contributed most of the capital for the                 
          acquisition of HIEI and took 90 percent of the stock in the                 
          corporation.  Petitioner received 10 percent of the stock of HIEI           
          and was named president of the corporation.  Although petitioner            

               2Petitioners concede they had additional rental income in              
          the amount of $2,363 and income from a cosmetology business in              
          the amount of $1,033 and owe self-employment tax on the                     
          cosmetology income.  Respondent concedes petitioners are not                
          liable for the estimated tax penalty in the amount of $217, and             
          that petitioners are not liable for the $2,119 in FICA tax                  
          determined in the notice of deficiency.                                     




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011