William N. Kellahan, Jr. and Alice H. Kellahan - Page 5




                                        - 5 -                                         

               Petitioner William N. Kellahan, Jr. (petitioner) had been              
          engaged in the purchase of properties at tax sales since the                
          early 1980’s, as a member of a partnership by the name of DAK,              
          which consisted of W. W. Dibble, Harry R. Askins, Jr., and                  
          petitioner.  DAK generated income by purchasing properties at tax           
          sales and selling them back to the previous owners, thereby                 
          collecting redemption fees.  If a property owner was delinquent             
          in paying property taxes, the county could seize the property and           
          sell it.  The property would be sold at auction to the highest              
          bidder, whose bid would include the delinquent taxes and                    
          penalties.  The delinquent taxpayer would have 12 months in which           
          to reacquire or “redeem” the property, by paying the delinquent             
          taxes and penalties plus an additional fee equal to 8 percent of            
          the bid amount.  If property sold at auction was redeemed during            
          the redemption period, the purchaser at auction would receive a             
          refund of his bid price plus the 8-percent redemption fee; if               
          there was no redemption, the auction purchaser would acquire                
          title.                                                                      
               DAK’s principal objective in engaging in the tax sale                  
          purchases was to collect the 8-percent redemption fees, which               
          were distributed to the partners.  Approximately 80 to 85 percent           
          of the properties purchased by DAK were redeemed.  Properties               
          that were not redeemed would be distributed by DAK to the                   
          individual partners, who would attempt to sell them at a gain.              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011