- 14 - find that petitioners have failed to substantiate the business purpose of petitioner wife's claimed expenses. We hold that petitioners are not entitled to any deductions for 1993 for petitioner wife's claimed expenses. The second issue for decision is whether petitioners are entitled to a medical expense deduction for 1993 in excess of the amounts allowed and conceded by respondent. On a Schedule A attached to their 1993 return, petitioners claimed medical expenses in the amount of $10,668.36. After accounting for the section 213(a) limitation, petitioners claimed a medical expense deduction for 1993 in the amount of $7,032.51. In the statutory notice of deficiency, respondent determined that petitioners did not establish that they paid more than $8,978 for medical expenses during 1993. Respondent allowed petitioners a medical expense deduction in the amount of $3,724, after accounting for his adjustments to their adjusted gross income and the section 213(a) limitation.3 At trial, respondent conceded that petitioners are entitled to deduct an additional $20 of medical expenses. This concession leaves $1,670.36 of the claimed medical expenses in issue, which approximates the amount 3 Respondent's adjustments to petitioners' medical expense deductions for 1993 and 1994, to the extent based on his adjustments to petitioners' adjusted gross income and sec. 213 limitations for 1993 and 1994, are computational and will be resolved by the Court's holding on the first issue in this case.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011