Timothy Klusken - Page 4




                                        - 4 -                                         
          received from Strategic did not constitute compensation for                 
          employment or for any employment-related activities, nor were               
          they repayments of funds or dividends issued with respect to                
          stock.                                                                      
               Petitioner also claimed expenses of $567.99 on Schedule C              
          which consisted of $67.35 for Internet access fees, $157.50 for             
          maintenance dues, $15 for postage, and $328.14 for the startup              
          kit/initiation fee.  As a result, petitioner reported a net                 
          profit of $19,787.                                                          
               In the notice of deficiency, respondent determined that                
          petitioner was liable for self-employment tax (and entitled to              
          the self-employment tax deduction) on $19,787.                              
               Petitioner contends that he is not liable for self-                    
          employment tax since he was not involved in this activity with              
          continuity and regularity.  Petitioner argues that he did not               
          sell any of Strategic’s product and that he did not recruit any             
          downline distributors.  He claims that Ms. Schaff-Hahn or someone           
          above her recruited the downline distributors and placed them               
          below petitioner.                                                           
               Additionally, petitioner contends that he paid maintenance             
          fees of roughly $75 per month to maintain his distributorship.              
          Petitioner authorized Strategic to charge his credit card monthly           
          in exchange for a “Monthly Collector Series Single IRC”, which              
          petitioner testified was a collector’s phone card.  Petitioner              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011