- 6 - The Audit and Respondent's Reconstruction of Gross Sales Revenue Agent William Bixler was assigned to audit petitioners' 1991, 1992, and 1993 tax years. During that audit, he discovered that for 1991 Classic Pub's monthly gross sales reported on its MBAR were less than the State average for similar establishments. Further investigation by Revenue Agent Bixler revealed that Classic Pub, Inc. reported differing amounts of gross sales on its Federal income tax returns, MBARs, State sales tax returns, and profit and loss statements, and that none of the reported gross sales were consistent with Classic Pub's daily sales journals. The varying amounts of gross sales as reported in these documents are reflected in the following table: Documents on Which Gross Sales Were Reported State Profit & Monthly Journals Form Sales Tax Loss Sales Including Sales Without Year 1120S MBAR Return Statement 9% Sales Tax 9% Sales Tax 1991 $294,214 $313,667 $296,132 $291,656 $314,682 $288,699 1992 403,213 418,213 388,387 400,249 416,928 382,503 1993 414,649 441,717 --- 414,649 --- --- Because of the lack of internal controls for income reporting purposes and the inconsistencies between Classic Pub, Inc.'s Forms 1120S, MBARs, State sales tax returns, and profit and loss statements, Revenue Agent Bixler decided to reconstruct Classic Pub's sales of mixed drinks, beer, and wine. In doing so, he employed an indirect method to determine Classic Pub's gross sales, utilizing information and calculations provided to him by petitioners, including Classic Pub's purchases of alcohol, pricesPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011