Leema Enterprises, Inc. - Page 16




                                       - 16 -                                         

               B.  Stock Forwards                                                     
                    (1)  Formation                                                    
               In 1981, Congress eliminated the tax advantages of straddling.         
          It passed the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 (ERTA), Pub. L. 97-         
          34, sec. 508(a), (c), 95 Stat. 172, 333, parts of which operated to         
          deny deductions for losses produced by tax straddles except to the          
          extent that such losses exceed the unrealized gains retained for            
          realization in the next taxable year.                                       
               In 1981, after enactment of ERTA, Merit decided to offer a             
          market in forward contracts on selected listed corporate stocks.            
          Stock forwards are contracts for the sale of shares of corporate            
          stock at a specified future date for a specified price.  Merit's            
          forward contracts were similar to its option contracts in that both         
          involved agreements for the future purchase of a commodity.  In a           
          forward transaction, however, one party agrees that it will be              
          obligated to buy or sell marketable corporate stock at a future             
          date (the settlement date) at a fixed price.  Merit's option                
          contracts, in contrast, involved the sale of a right, but not the           
          obligation, to buy or sell that commodity.                                  
               Merit's forward contracts were written on common stocks traded         
          on the New York Stock Exchange or on the American Stock Exchange.           
          In the stock forwards market, Merit functioned as a clearinghouse,          
          whereby it was the opposite party to every transaction between              
          customers in its market.  It did not take positions that exposed it         


               5(...continued)                                                        
          overall gain was $226,481.17.                                               

Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011