- 8 - less justified between May 11, 1998, the date the proposed settlement was rejected, and May 18, 1998. Respondent has failed to establish that his position was substantially justified beyond May 11, 1998, the date when the proposed settlement was rejected. Accordingly, petitioners are entitled to attorney’s fees incurred after May 11, 1998, when the case was forwarded from the IRS Appeals Office to the District Counsel. C. Unreasonable Protraction of Proceeding Respondent contends that petitioners unreasonably protracted the litigation proceedings, but respondent failed to provide any examples of how petitioners acted unreasonably. Section 7430(b)(3) provides that no award of litigation costs may be made for any portion of the proceeding that the prevailing party unreasonably protracted. After petitioners provided respondent with the requested information, petitioners did nothing to protract the proceeding. Moreover, petitioners’ counsel agreed to respondent’s proposed settlement agreement on the same day that it was received. D. Amount of Attorney’s Fees and Expenses To Be Awarded Having determined when in the court proceeding respondent’s position was no longer substantially justified, we must determine the appropriate amount of attorney’s fees and expenses to be awarded. Petitioners submitted a bill showing $1,023.66 ofPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011