- 37 -
transferred the $174.9 million received from MFE N.V. to Limited
Services to reduce the balance outstanding under a line of credit
extended to WFNNB by Limited Services.
WFNNB is a wholly owned subsidiary of petitioner, and,
therefore, the reduction of WFNNB’s line of credit balance to
Limited Service directly benefited petitioner. As we shall
explain in the next section of this report, we find that
respondent did not abuse his discretion in attributing the MFE
N.V. CDs to MFE. We therefore view the purchase of the MFE N.V.
CDs as a repatriation of the earnings of MFE. Because that
repatriation made the earnings of MFE (a controlled foreign
corporation) available for use by its only U.S. shareholder
(petitioner), we find that the repatriation was substantially the
equivalent of a dividend being paid by MFE to petitioner. The
purchase of the MFE N.V. CDs was an investment in U.S. property.
The exception for section 956 deposits is unavailable.
F. Section 1.956-1T(b)(4), Temporary Income Tax Regs.
Section 1.956-1T(b)(4), Temporary Income Tax Regs., 53 Fed.
Reg. 22165 (June 14, 1988), empowers respondent to attribute to
MFE the MFE N.V. CDs if one of the principal purposes for
creating, organizing, or funding MFE N.V. was to avoid the
application of section 956 with respect to MFE.
Petitioner argues that the purpose of organizing MFE N.V.
was to inject an additional corporate layer between MFE and the
Page: Previous 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011