John Paul Massa - Page 4




                                        - 4 -                                         
               Section 162(a) allows a deduction for the ordinary and                 
          necessary expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year in              
          carrying on a trade or business.  The record contains evidence of           
          communications which petitioner had in 1991 and 1992 concerning             
          potential trade with individuals in the former Soviet Republics,            
          including Russia.  However, there is no evidence that any                   
          completed business transactions resulted from his communications            
          and travel to Russia.  Petitioner testified that the lack of a              
          reliable infrastructure and instability in the Russian currency             
          convinced him that business ventures in Russia were too risky.              
               Based on the record, we find that petitioner was not                   
          "carrying on a trade or business" during 1992.  Rather, we find             
          that he was investigating potential trade opportunities.  We                
          further find that the amounts paid by him during 1992 in                    
          connection with his trade activity constitute "start-up                     
          expenditures" which are only deductible over the 60-month period            
          beginning in the month in which an active trade or business                 
          begins.  Sec. 195(b)(1) and (c).  We hold that petitioner is not            
          entitled to any deductions for his Schedule C trade or business             
          expenses for 1992 because his alleged business activity did not             
          rise to the level of an active trade or business during 1992.               
          Sec. 195.                                                                   
               The second issue for decision is whether petitioner is                 
          entitled to a medical expense deduction for amounts claimed for             
          his special diet.                                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011