Frank and Virginia Muhich - Page 2




                                        - 2 -                                         

          determinations of the following deficiencies and accuracy-related           
          penalties under section 6662(a):                                            
               Frank and Virginia Muhich, docket No. 21561-97                         
                                                       Penalty                        
               Year                Deficiency          Sec. 6662(a)                   
               1994                $18,164             $3,633                         
               1995                21,885              4,377                          
               Midwest Portraits Corp., docket No. 21562-97                           
                                             Penalty                                  
               Year Ended          Deficiency          Sec. 6662(a)                   
               June 30, 1994       $15,075             $3,015                         
               June 30, 1995       26,090              5,218                          
               June 30, 1996       40,137              8,027                          
               We must decide the following issues:                                   
               1.  Whether the trusts implemented and used by the Muhichs             
          during 1994 and 1995 should be disregarded for tax purposes                 
          because the trusts lacked economic substance.  We hold they                 
          should.1                                                                    
               2.  Whether the Muhichs' 1994 and 1995 gross income includes           
          compensation paid by Midwest in the amounts of $112,820 and                 
          $130,193, respectively.  We hold it does.                                   






               1 Respondent also raises the alternative argument that                 
          petitioners are taxable on trust income because the trusts were             
          "grantor trusts".  Given our holding that the trusts are shams,             
          we need not and do not reach this issue.                                    




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011