Michael R. and Sheila Olsen - Page 4




                                        - 4 -                                         
          Commissioner, 85 T.C. 359 (1985); Saigh v. Commissioner, 26 T.C.            
          171 (1956); Lee v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1993-254.                       
               The record in this case clearly shows that the stipulation             
          was read into the record and agreed to by petitioners and was               
          fairly and freely entered into by both parties.  When the Court             
          asked petitioners whether they agreed with the stipulation,                 
          petitioners responded, "Yes, your Honor."  Petitioners also                 
          understood the amount of net tax due resulting from the                     
          agreement.  The record includes no evidence or reasonable                   
          argument to show that justice requires that petitioners be                  
          relieved of their stipulation.  Accordingly, we hold that the               
          parties' oral stipulation is binding and enforceable.  Moreover,            
          we find that respondent's calculation of tax accurately reflects            
          the stipulation that was orally read into the record.                       
               Therefore, we grant respondent's motion for entry of                   
          decision and hold that petitioners are liable for a deficiency in           
          income tax for the year 1996 in the amount of $2,045.                       
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              
                                                  An appropriate order and            
                                             decision will be entered.                













Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  

Last modified: May 25, 2011