Harry Olstein - Page 7




                                        - 7 -                                         

          conclude that the relationship between the Kramers and Whitehouse           
          is irrelevant because Whitehouse was seeking only to dispose of a           
          capital asset when it sold the lots.  See, e.g., Estate of Mundy            
          v. Commissioner, 36 T.C. 703 (1961) (holding that the activities            
          of a taxpayer, including the activities of an agent imputed to              
          the taxpayer, taken together with all other facts, must place the           
          taxpayer in a business so that the property in question can be              
          said to be held by the taxpayer for sale to customers in his                
          business); cf. Kaltreider v. Commissioner, supra (noting that the           
          taxpayers sold property to their closely held corporation to                
          develop and sell); Bauschard v. Commissioner, 31 T.C. 910 (1959)            
          (holding that the taxpayer's activities were sufficient to place            
          him in the real estate development business), affd. 279 F.2d 115            
          (6th Cir. 1960).                                                            
               Contentions we have not addressed are irrelevant, moot, or             
          meritless.                                                                  
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              

                                                  Decision will be entered            
                                             under Rule 155.                          













Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  

Last modified: May 25, 2011