Lee F. Parker and Diane K. Parker - Page 7




                                        - 7 -                                         
                    residence, there shall be included only so much of                
                    his cost as is attributable to the acquisition,                   
                    construction, reconstruction, and improvements                    
                    made which are properly chargeable to capital                     
                    account, during the period specified in                           
                    subsection(a).                                                    
          (Section 1034 was repealed by section 312(b) of the Taxpayer                
          Relief Act of 1997, Pub. L. 105-34, 111 Stat. 839, generally                
          effective for sales and exchanges of principal residences after             
          May 6, 1997.  The section 1034 rollover provision was replaced by           
          an expanded and revised section 121.)                                       
                               General Interpretation                                 
               As a threshold matter, section 1034 specifies that gain must           
          be reinvested in property “purchased and used by the taxpayer as            
          his principal residence” in order for nonrecognition treatment to           
          be available.  In ascertaining what is meant by “used” as a                 
          “principal residence”, this Court has stated in an oft-quoted               
          pronouncement: “The elements of residence are the fact of abode             
          and the intention of remaining, and the concept of residence is             
          made up of a combination of acts and intention.  Neither bodily             
          presence alone nor intention alone will suffice to create a                 
          residence.”  Stolk v. Commissioner, 40 T.C. 345, 353 (1963),                
          affd. 326 F.2d 760 (2d Cir. 1964); see also Perry v.                        
          Commissioner, 91 F.3d 82, 85 (9th Cir. 1996), affg. T.C. Memo.              
          1994-247.                                                                   
               With respect to the abode element, courts have consistently            
          focused upon actual, physical use and occupancy as a prerequisite           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011