- 8 -
g. Bartling held herself out as a
married woman * * *.
h. By virtue of holding herself out
as a married woman, Bartling thereby lost
certain inheritances from her parents she
would have had if she had been a single
person at the time of their deaths.
Based upon the above allegations, Ms. Wagner's petition
sets forth four separate grounds for relief: (1) Inten-
tional infliction of emotional distress; (2) fraud and
deceit and misrepresentation of capacity to marry; (3)
breach of promise to marry; and (4) quantum meruit. The
action instituted by Ms. Wagner is referred to herein as
the Bartling lawsuit.
On March 6, 1992, petitioner amended his declaratory
judgment action into a petition for annulment of marriage.
On or about April 27, 1992, petitioner filed a second
amended petition for annulment of marriage (Domestic Law).
The prayer for relief of the amended petition states as
follows:
WHEREFORE, Petitioner prays that the Court
decree that the marriage of the parties be null
and void; that each party should receive all
property, whether real or personal, and moneys,
securities and other valuable items of all types
that each party personally accumulated during the
period since May 5 [sic], 1982; and for such
other and further relief that the Court may deem
just and proper.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011