Gregory H. and Elizabeth A. Price - Page 15




                                       - 15 -                                         

          Respondent's Recomputation of Depreciation                                  
                                               1989       1990      1991              
          Partnership                                                                 
          Depreciation claimed on return     $55,452   $145,057  $118,404             
          Videos expensed on return          44,264       --      --                  
          Recomputed depreciation              (86,765)  (181,015) (159,833)          
          Total decrease/(increase)          12,951    (35,958)  (41,429)             
          petitioner's one-half share          6,475    (17,979)  (20,715)            

          Petitioners                                                                 
          Depreciation claimed on return                56,074    95,293              
          Videos expensed on return                              73,991               
          Recomputed depreciation                  (55,715) (121,075)                 
          Total decrease                          $    359  $ 48,209                  
               A reasonable depreciation deduction is allowed for the                 
          exhaustion and wear and tear of property used in a trade or                 
          business.  See sec. 167(a).  Under sections 167(c) and 168(f),              
          movie videos are to be depreciated for Federal income tax                   
          purposes using a straight-line method.  See Rev. Rul. 89-62,                
          1989-1 C.B. 78.                                                             
               Petitioner argues that for 1989 and 1991, respectively, of             
          the above adjustments made by respondent, respondent incorrectly            
          classified $44,264 for the partnership and $73,991 for                      
          petitioners as costs of videos, as not currently deductible, and            
          as subject to straight-line depreciation.  Petitioners claim that           
          such funds related to the cost of supplies for the Stores and               
          were properly expensed by the partnership and by petitioners.               
               No evidence supports petitioners’ contention.  We sustain              
          respondent’s adjustments to current expenses and to depreciation            
          claimed relating to videos rented to customers.                             





Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011