Mark D. Pridgen and Kay D. Pridgen - Page 32




                                       - 32 -                                         

             Respondent concedes that the above checks, totaling                      
             $288,560.47, were included in Beaufort Leaf's unreported                 
             income for 1991, as determined by respondent.  There is no               
             evidence that any other unreported income was related in                 
             any way to the scheme to sell excess-quota tobacco.                      
                  As a preliminary matter, several comments about the                 
             facts of these cases are in order.  First, we disagree                   
             with petitioners' assertion that the source of all of                    
             the unreported income at issue was the "illegal scheme                   
             engineered by Harry Lee Roberts whereby Roberts was engaged              
             in numerous sales of over-quota tobacco, in violation of                 
             federal law and Department of Agriculture regulations."                  
             Petitioners assert that respondent's answer acknowledged                 
             that the unreported sales of tobacco were "the direct                    
             result" of the illegal scheme.  Contrary to petitioners'                 
             assertion, respondent's answer admitted only that                        
             Mr. Roberts engaged in such a scheme, but it did not                     
             admit that the scheme was the source of all or any of the                
             unreported income determined in these cases.  As discussed               
             above, there is no evidence that any of the unreported                   
             income in 1990 or 1991 was related in any way to the                     
             scheme, except for $288,560 in 1991 that was deposited into              
             accounts controlled by Mr. Wells.  Even as to this amount,               
             there is nothing in the audit report involving Mr. Wells                 





Page:  Previous  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011