Timothy and Deborah Provost - Page 4




                                        - 4 -                                         

               Respondent determined that petitioners:  (1) Were not                  
          entitled to deductions for a $159,565 ordinary loss and a $58,863           
          net operating loss carryforward, relating to 1989; (2) failed to            
          report $2,302 and $4,495 of capital gain income relating to stock           
          sales in 1990 and 1991, respectively; (3) failed to file timely             
          returns relating to 1989, 1990, and 1991 and are liable for                 
          section 6651 additions to tax; (4) failed to pay estimated income           
          tax relating to 1990 and 1991 and are liable for section 6654               
          additions to tax; and (5) were negligent in determining their               
          1989 tax liability and are liable for a section 6662 penalty.               
          Petitioners bear the burden of proof, yet have failed to present            
          sufficient credible evidence to establish that respondent's                 
          determinations are incorrect.  See Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S.             
          111, 115 (1933).  Accordingly, we sustain respondent's                      
          determinations.                                                             
               Respondent also determined that petitioners, in 1989, were             
          not entitled to deduct $29,086 of mortgage interest relating to             
          properties owned by Sandew.  Petitioners contend that Sandew was            
          bankrupt, and, as guarantors of Sandew's loans, petitioners were            
          obligated to pay Sandew's interest expenses and, therefore,                 
          entitled to a deduction pursuant to section 163.  Generally, a              
          guarantor is not entitled to an interest expense deduction with             
          respect to payments made in fulfillment of a mere guaranty                  
          obligation.  See Hynes v. Commissioner, 74 T.C. 1266, 1287-1288             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011