James H. Pugh, Jr., and Alexis C. Pugh - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         

          liquidation.  Petitioner's ECC common stock became worthless                
          during 1990.                                                                
               In completing its 1990 Form 1120S, U.S. Income Tax Return              
          for an S Corporation, ECC properly excluded the COD income from             
          its income pursuant to section 108.  On petitioner's Schedule K-1           
          (Form 1120S), Shareholder's Share of Income, Credits, Deductions,           
          Etc., ECC separately stated the COD income and reported                     
          petitioner's pro rata share in the amount of $612,245.                      
          Petitioner increased his basis in his ECC stock in 1990 by the              
          $612,245.  Petitioner's basis in his ECC stock on December 31,              
          1990, taking into account all adjustments other than that for               
          ECC's COD income, was $394,802.  On petitioners' 1990 Federal               
          income tax return, they reported a capital loss with respect to             
          the ECC stock commensurate with petitioner's reported basis in              
          the stock.  On their 1991 return, petitioners carried forward and           
          reported capital losses from 1990.  Coopers & Lybrand, a                    
          certified public accounting firm, prepared petitioners' tax                 
          returns for 1990 and 1991 and ECC's return for 1990.                        
               Respondent disallowed the inclusion of the COD income in               
          petitioner's basis in his ECC stock and reduced Mr. Pugh's loss             
          accordingly.  Respondent also determined increases in                       
          petitioners' income in the amounts of $60,077 and $5,763 for 1990           
          and 1991, respectively, for gain on the sale of stock in Epoch              
          Management, Inc., which sale petitioners failed to report on                
          their returns.  Petitioners have conceded the latter adjustments.           
          Respondent determined accuracy-related penalties for 1990 and               

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011