- 43 - and that the aggregate fair market value of Marrero Land's assets was $69,309,588.12 We shall now consider the views of the parties' respective stock valuation experts, each of whom determined the fair market value of decedent's interest in Marrero Land on the valuation date. We turn first to respondent's stock valuation expert, Mr. Moore. Mr. Moore applied the following three approaches in valuing decedent's interest in Marrero Land: Discounted net asset value approach, public market multiples approach, and liquidation value approach. In arriving at a value under the discounted net asset value approach, Mr. Moore applied a real estate company discount of 30 percent to the net asset value of Marrero Land as of the valuation date. Mr. Moore determined that net asset value by relying on, inter alia, Mr. Guice's determina- tion of the aggregate fair market value of the remaining unim- proved real properties on that date. He then applied a 35- percent lack-of-marketability discount and arrived at a value for decedent's interest in Marrero Land as of the valuation date of $8,364,731. Mr. Moore considered the discounted net asset value approach to be "quite realistic". 12We have considered all of the contentions of respondent regarding Mr. Egan's valuation of the remaining unimproved real properties that are not discussed herein, and we find them to be without merit.Page: Previous 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011