Saba Partnership, Brunswick Corporation, Tax Matters Partnership - Page 120




                                       - 86 -                                         
         The $25,000 item was labeled "incorporation fee".  In addition,              
         respondent disallowed a deduction of $120,266 that Saba had                  
         reported for amounts paid to Cravath, Swaine & Moore during the              
         taxable year ended March 31, 1991, as well as the amortization of            
         $1,500 and $8,500 attributable to amounts paid to Cravath, Swaine            
         & Moore for the taxable years ended March 31, 1991 and June 21,              
         1992, respectively.  Respondent determined that the disallowed               
         amounts had not been substantiated and that petitioner had failed            
         to demonstrate that the amounts represented ordinary and                     
         necessary business expenses.                                                 
              Respondent made several alternative determinations in the               
         event the Court were to recognize Saba as a partnership for                  
         Federal income tax purposes.  Respondent determined in pertinent             
         part:  (1) No gain or loss would be recognized on the purchase               
         and sale of the Chase PPNs because the transactions lacked                   
         economic substance; and (2) Saba’s bases in the LIBOR notes                  
         distributed to Brunswick and SBC were $26,601,451 and $7,032,954,            
         respectively.                                                                
              B.  Otrabanda FPAA                                                      
              On December 30, 1996, respondent issued an FPAA to                      
         Otrabanda.  Respondent determined:  (1) The transactions                     
         financing the purchase and sale of the IBJ CDs would not be                  
         recognized for Federal income tax purposes for lack of economic              
         substance; (2) Otrabanda would not be recognized as a                        






Page:  Previous  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011