Renee B. Simpson - Page 7




                                        - 7 -                                         

          Rules of Civil Procedure states that the grids3 assume that an              
          order will be unallocated.                                                  
               Under Federal tax law, there are tax consequences resulting            
          from an award's being classified as alimony or child support.               
          Under section 215, an individual taxpayer is allowed to deduct              
          amounts paid as alimony.  Alimony payments are includable in the            
          gross income of the recipient under section 71.  Child support              
          payments, on the other hand, are nondeductible by the payor and             
          are specifically excluded from the definition of alimony and thus           
          not includable in the gross income of the payee parent under                
          section 71(c).                                                              
               To determine whether any portion of the payment is child               
          support, we look solely to the language contained in the court              
          order itself.  See sec. 71(c)(1).  The language of section                  
          71(c)(1) is clear that for payments to be child support, the                
          written divorce instrument by its terms must fix a sum which is             
          payable as child support.  It is inappropriate, in light of this            
          clear statutory language, to look beyond the written instrument             




               3The amount of child, spousal support, or alimony pendente             
          lite "shall be determined in accordance with the support                    
          guidelines" either by using the net income formula or by using              
          charts derived from the formula, called "grids".  Pa. R. Civ.               
          Proc. 1910.16-1(b); Pa. R. Civ. Proc. 1910.16-1, Explanatory                
          Comment C.2; Pa. R. Civ. Proc. 1910.16-3; see also Ball v.                  
          Minnick, 648 A.2d 1192 (Pa. 1994).                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011