Dennis W. Stark - Page 15



                                       - 15 -                                         
               Where the surrounding circumstances indicate a debt is                 
          worthless and uncollectible, and the legal action to enforce                
          payment in all probability would not result in satisfaction on              
          execution of a judgment, a showing of these facts will be                   
          sufficient evidence of the worthlessness of the debt.  Sec.                 
          1.166-2(b), Income Tax Regs.  We have allowed a bad debt                    
          deduction where the taxpayer received advice of legal counsel,              
          based on objective facts, that the cost of recovery would exceed            
          the amount of the debt.  See Johnstone v. Commissioner, 17 B.T.A.           
          366, 368 (1929); United States Tool Co. v. Commissioner, 3 B.T.A.           
          492 (1926); Green v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1976-127.                     
          Nevertheless, a debt is not worthless merely because it may be              
          difficult to collect.  Reading & Bates Corp. v. United States, 40           
          Fed. Cl. 737, 757 (1998).  To be entitled to a deduction under              
          section 166(a)(1), a taxpayer must exhaust all reasonable means             
          of collection or prove that such steps would be futile.  H.D. Lee           
          Mercantile Co. v. Commissioner, 79 F.2d 391, 393 (10th Cir.                 
          1935); Perry v. Commissioner, 22 T.C. 968, 974 (1954); A.                   
          Finkenberg's Sons, Inc. v. Commissioner, 17 T.C. 973, 984 (1951).           
          Choosing not to enforce a debt does not render it worthless.                
          Southwestern Life Ins. Co. v. United States, 560 F.2d 627, 644              
          (5th Cir. 1977).                                                            



               6(...continued)                                                        
          to the $490,000 received for his Lakeview stock and the $75,000             
          received for his half interest in the Fence Property.  During               
          1992, William received another check for $75,000 from Lakeview.             
          In addition, William owned several parcels of real estate.                  



Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011