R. Scot Stokes - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         

          pizza business to the annuity trust in exchange for a joint and             
          survivor annuity.2                                                          
               Under provisions of the annuity contract, petitioner and his           
          wife are not to begin receiving annuity payments until                      
          November 15, 2023.  Thereafter, petitioner and his wife are to              
          receive $4,734 a month for the remainder of their lives.  The               
          annuity trust, however, is entitled to make current distributions           
          of trust property to the named beneficiaries of the trust who               
          were all members of petitioner's family.                                    
               In documents associated with transfer of the pizza business            
          to the annuity trust, the pizza business is stated to have a                
          value of $152,000, and petitioner is stated to have a tax basis             
          in the business of $75,376.                                                 
               David J. Orr (Orr) and Barry Crosby (Crosby), employees of             
          Financial Planning Co., were named as trustees of the annuity               
          trust, but they were not independent, and they did not function             
          in any meaningful way as trustees of the trust.  Petitioner was             



          2    There is some evidence in the record that indicates that               
          petitioner's pizza business was owned by a closely held                     
          corporation, the stock in which was owned by petitioner and his             
          wife, and that the transfer of the pizza business to the annuity            
          trust took the form of a stock transfer.  Other evidence,                   
          however, indicates that the transfer of the pizza business to the           
          annuity trust took the form of a transfer of the underlying                 
          property and assets of the business.  Petitioner does not dispute           
          respondent's treatment of the transfer as a transfer of the                 
          underlying property and assets.                                             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011