Walter R. Strohmaier - Page 8




                                        - 8 -                                         

          the $16,828 claimed on 57,355 business miles.  That same return             
          also stated that petitioner had no commuting mileage during 1994            
          and an additional 3,019 miles for other purposes.  In the notice            
          of deficiency, respondent determined that petitioner had 53,755             
          business miles during 1994 instead of 57,355 miles claimed on the           
          return.  Respondent allowed a deduction of $15,589 at the rate of           
          29 cents per mile and disallowed $1,239, the balance of the                 
          amount claimed for 1994.  For both years, the allowable business            
          mileage determined by respondent represented a disallowance of              
          3,600 miles for each year from the amounts claimed by petitioner            
          on his tax returns.  At trial, counsel for respondent stated that           
          the disallowed mileage represented mileage that respondent                  
          determined to be commuting mileage by petitioner with respect to            
          his ministerial and insurance activities.  As to the insurance              
          activity, respondent determined that petitioner incurred                    
          commuting mileage from his residence to his first destination and           
          from his last destination to his residence.  The disallowed                 
          commuter mileage also included the mileage from petitioner's                
          residence to and from the areas where petitioner was involved in            
          his ministerial activity.                                                   
               Petitioner has not challenged the formula or the method by             
          which respondent determined the 3,600 disallowed business miles             
          for each year at issue.  Petitioner contends that his principal             
          place of business for both the insurance and ministerial                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011