Harold F. and Barbara J. Swiatek - Page 7




                                        - 7 -                                         

          Notice of Deficiency                                                        
               On February 28, 1997, respondent issued a notice of deficiency         
          increasing petitioners' 1991 taxable income by $295,315,                    
          attributing $271,836 of this amount to payments petitioner received         
          from Mr. Garcia and/or AVD and LI.  Respondent also determined a            
          section 6662(a) accuracy-related penalty but, as noted, now                 
          concedes the penalty.                                                       
                              ULTIMATE FINDINGS OF FACT                               
               The $271,836 petitioner received from Mr. Garcia and/or AVD            
          and LI in 1991 were loans.                                                  
                                       OPINION                                        
               The issue for decision centers on the characterization of the          
          $271,836 petitioner received during 1991 from Mr. Garcia and/or AVD         
          and LI.  Petitioners maintain that these payments were loans;               
          respondent contends they constitute income.                                 
               Whether an advance is characterized as a loan or income is a           
          factual question which we determine by considering the entire               
          record.  See Fisher v. Commissioner, 54 T.C. 905 (1970).  In order          
          for a bona fide loan to exist, two requirements are necessary: (1)          
          A good faith intent to make repayment on the part of the recipient          
          of the funds, and (2) a good faith intent to enforce repayment on           
          the part of the lender of the funds.  See, e.g., id. at 909-910.            
               Petitioners have the burden to prove that the payments from            
          Mr. Garcia and/or AVD and LI were loans.  See Rule 142(a); Welch v.         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011